fbpx Skip to Main Content

Blog

U.S. Bishops call for prayers, care for others after shooting in Las Vegas

(CNS photo/Steve Marcus, Las Vegas Sun)A body is covered with a sheet in the intersection of Tropicana Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard South after an Oct. 1 mass shooting at a music festival on the Las Vegas Strip. A gunman perched high on the 32nd floor of a casino hotel unleashed a shower of bullets on an outdoor country music festival below, killing at least 50 people and wounding hundreds, making it the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history.
On October 2, Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo, Archbishop of Galveston-Houston, and President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), expressed “deep grief” after a deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas.

The full text of the statement follows:

“We woke this morning and learned of yet another night filled with unspeakable terror, this time in the city of Las Vegas, and by all accounts, the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.  My heart and my prayers, and those of my brother bishops and all the members of the Church, go out to the victims of this tragedy and to the city of Las Vegas.  At this time, we need to pray and to take care of those who are suffering.  In the end, the only response is to do good – for no matter what the darkness, it will never overcome the light.  May the Lord of all gentleness surround all those who are suffering from this evil, and for those who have been killed we pray, eternal rest grant unto them, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them.”

“I join with Cardinal DiNardo in offering my prayers for the victims, their families, and for the first-responders,” said Bishop Christopher J. Coyne of the Diocese of Burlington, “and I invite all those of the Catholic community in Vermont to do so as well.”

U.S. Bishop Chairmen Speak Out on U.S. Department of Justice Dismissal of a Case Involving Conscience Law

The U.S. Department of Justice has announced that it is voluntarily dismissing a case against the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMC) that it had brought after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights found that UVMC forced a nurse to participate in an elective abortion against the nurse’s religious beliefs.

The Church Amendment, enacted in 1973, prohibits recipients of various federal health program funding from discriminating against health care personnel because of their religious beliefs or moral convictions about abortions. In the UVMC case, HHS found that UVMC not only engages in such discrimination, but on one occasion even deliberately deceived and coerced a nurse into assisting in an abortion.

Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee for Religious Liberty, and Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City in Kansas, chairman of the USCCB’s, issued the following statement:

“The U.S. Department of Justice is acting in dereliction of its duty to enforce the plain meaning of federal law. It is hard to imagine a more horrific civil rights violation than being forced to take an innocent human life. HHS found that the University of Vermont Medical Center forced a nurse, against her known religious beliefs, to do just that. This is not only deeply wrong, but a violation of federal law. We call on the Administration to stand up for the basic dignity of our nation’s health care workers by reopening this case, and on Congress to pass the Conscience Protection Act so that doctors and nurses can defend their own rights in court.”

U.S. bishop chairmen say Equality Act would discriminate against people of faith, threaten unborn life

Five committee chairmen of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote a letter to members of Congress opposing the recent reintroduction of the Equality Act which is scheduled to be voted on by the U.S. House of Representatives this week. The bishops warned of the threats posed by the proposed legislation to both people of faith and of no faith with respect to mandates impacting charities and their beneficiaries in need, health care and other conscience rights, taxpayer funding of abortion, freedom of speech, women’s sports and sex-specific facilities. Their letter explained:

“[E]very person is made in the image of God and should be treated accordingly, with respect and compassion. This commitment is reflected in the Church’s charitable service to all people, without regard to race, religion or any other characteristic. It means we need to honor every person’s right to gainful employment free of unjust discrimination or harassment and to the basic goods that they need to live and thrive. It also means that people of differing beliefs should be respected.”

Furthermore, the bishop chairmen asserted, “The [Equality Act] represents the imposition by Congress of novel and divisive viewpoints regarding ‘gender’ on individuals and organizations. This includes dismissing sexual difference and falsely presenting ‘gender’ as only a social construct. As Pope Francis has reflected, however, ‘biological sex and the socio-cultural role of sex (gender) can be distinguished but not separated. … It is one thing to be understanding of human weakness and the complexities of life and another to accept ideologies that attempt to sunder what are inseparable aspects of reality.’ Tragically, this Act can also be construed to include an abortion mandate, a violation of precious rights to life and conscience.”

They concluded, “Rather than affirm human dignity in ways that meaningfully exceed existing practical protections, the Equality Act would discriminate against people of faith.”

The letter was jointly signed by Bishop Michael C. Barber, SJ, of Oakland, chairman of the Committee on Catholic Education; Archbishop Paul S. Coakley of Oklahoma City, chairman of the Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development; Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, chairman of the Committee for Religious Liberty; Bishop David A. Konderla of Tulsa, chairman of the Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage; and  Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities.

The letter is available at

usccb.org/resources/Letter_to_Congress_on_Equality_Act_Feb_23_2021.

More information and resources related to the USCCB’s stance on the Equality Act may be found at usccb.org/equality-act.

U.N. nuncio praises nations for recognizing rights of indigenous peoples

The Vatican’s nuncio to the United Nations called it welcome news that several nations around the world “have taken active steps to recognize the right to autonomy or self-government of indigenous peoples.”

Such “concrete actions provide a mutually beneficial framework for the engagement between the state government and the indigenous people,” said Archbishop Bernardito Auza, the Vatican’s permanent observer to the United Nations, in remarks Oct. 11.

“They also contribute to the recognition and realization of the rights of indigenous peoples, their extraordinary cultural and spiritual patrimony, and their valuable contribution to broader society and the common good,” he added.

His statement was issued in reaction to a recent report from the “special rapporteur” on the rights of indigenous peoples. His remarks were addressed to the Third Committee of the 74th session of the U.N. General Assembly for its agenda item on the “Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” They were delivered by Msgr. Fredrik Hansen, first secretary at the Vatican’s U.N. permanent observer mission.

Quoting Pope Francis, the archbishop said: “It is essential to show special care for indigenous communities and their cultural traditions. They are not merely one minority among others, but should be the principal dialogue partners, especially when large projects affecting their land are proposed.”

Indigenous peoples are the ones who can “care best for their own patrimonial land and living traditions,” Archbishop Auza said, but in some places they “are under tremendous pressures to sell their ancestral land.”

“Or, in some cases,” he continued, “they are forced by outside interests to abandon their homes without their ‘free, prior and informed consent,’ as called for in the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.”

Formal recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples to autonomy or self-government “greatly contributes to promoting and pursuing” objectives of this U.N. declaration, Archbishop Auza said.

This includes the right of indigenous peoples “to maintain and strengthen” their “distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions,” he said, as well as the right “to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the state.”

Noting that 2019 is the International Year of Indigenous Languages, the archbishop also said the preservation of these languages is important not only for the indigenous peoples but also for the cultural heritage of the whole human family.

In declaring the yearlong observance, the U.N. General Assembly resolution called “on the international community to advance efforts ‘to preserve, promote and revitalize’ indigenous languages, so often in danger of extinction,” Archbishop Auza said.

The U.N. Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples acknowledged, he stated, that “indigenous peoples have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral traditions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures.”

 

U.N. declares special day to remember victims of violence against religion

The U.N. General Assembly has adopted a resolution establishing Aug. 22 as the Day to Commemorate Victims of Violence Based on Religion.

The resolution invites all member states, relevant organizations, civil society, individuals and the private sector to observe the international day and show appropriate support for victims of religiously motivated violence.

In the wake of recent religiously motivated terrorist attacks, the resolution notes a serious concern for “continuing acts of intolerance and violence based on religion or belief against individuals, including against persons belonging to religious communities and religious minorities around the world, and at the increasing number and intensity of such incidents.”

Poland initiated work toward the commemorative day, but united with Brazil, Canada, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Nigeria, Pakistan and the United States to co-draft the resolution.

Ultimately, 88 U.N. member states voted to co-sponsor the resolution.

“The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, which is commonly referred to as the right to freedom of religion or belief, is a universal right of every human being and the cornerstone of many other rights,” Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs Jacek Czaputowicz said in his keynote speech before the vote.

In response, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in Washington issued a statement praising the resolution.

“We applaud the U.N. General Assembly for adopting this resolution, which acknowledges and honors victims of violence based on religion or belief around the world,” said Tenzin Dorjee, chair of the commission. “But we must not stop at condemnation. Like-minded governments must also increasingly work together to hold perpetrators accountable, whether they are state or nonstate actors responsible for the abuses.”

The Vatican, too, commented on the resolution after its adoption in a statement released by its Permanent Observer Mission to the U.N. The statement recalled the recent religiously motivated violence in Sri Lanka, New Zealand, California and Burkina Faso.

“This resolution and the international day it establishes is an opportunity for the international community to focus on the victims and to strengthen efforts to eradicate such violence and acts of terrorism targeting persons because of their religion or belief,” it said.

The Vatican also reminded the U.N. that religion and belief cannot be blamed for these acts. They are, rather, deviations from religious practices and must be condemned.

— Elizabeth Bachmann

Two sides of one coin

A few years ago, I bumped into an old friend. He is one of the many Catholics who have left the Church, disagreeing with one or more teachings. One of his issues is the Catholic Church’s stance on abortion. “You know, if the Church proclaimed its own teachings on social justice with the same vigor that it teaches on abortion, there would be more Catholics. They preach on abortion about 10 times more than on social justice,” he asserted.

His speculation was not consistent with my own experience. Our teachings on the sanctity of human life and social justice are so closely related that they could be thought of as two sides of one coin, both revolving around the inherent dignity of the human person.

When the Church teaches on a matter of social justice, the starting point is the dignity of the human person, created in the image and likeness of God. Hence, all humans are equal in their inherent dignity. This is based in the Second Commandment to love our neighbor as we love ourselves.

Consequently, it is wrong to demean such an image and likeness of God – our neighbor. Acts of violence against others are likewise wrong, and except for legitimate acts of defense, are forbidden by the Fifth Commandment.

Aside from murder and overt violence, the most egregious forms of abuse of another are slavery and physical and sexual violence. Each represents extreme degradation of another human being. Likewise, emotional abuse constitutes serious injury to another’s wellbeing.

Acts of economic exploitation such as paying wages that provide less-than-reasonable support for the worker along with discrimination in employment decisions, oppressive working conditions and other acts of discrimination in economic or social matters likewise demean a human person and violate the laws of justice.

It is a serious offense against God to mistreat any part of creation with contempt or lack of respect. Environ-mental pollution by chemicals resulting from inadequate controls can have serious health consequences. Frequently, such pollution impacts the poor to a disproportionate degree. One need not look beyond current problems in Lake Champlain or perfluooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of the groundwater in the North Bennington area to have some sense of the harm that can be done. Such pollution disrupts the balance of the world created by God.

Tolerating unsafe working conditions results in workers being harmed. Outrageous medical practices such as occurred in the Vermont Eugenics Project or the notorious Tuskegee Project reveal a calloused attitude toward other human beings. Such practices violate the precepts of justice and human dignity.

The common theme in these situations involves a bigger, stronger, physically, socially or economically more powerful person exercising unjust and unfettered control over another, thereby inflicting suffering and violating the precepts of justice. The same dynamics of a bigger, stronger, more powerful person causing harm to others also surface in such areas as embryonic and fetal experimentation and illicit repro-ductive technologies. Many Catholic advocates for social justice are motivated by the mandate in Matthew’s Gospel: “Whatever you do for the least of these my brothers and sisters, you do unto me” (Mt 25: 40). The unborn, the terminally ill and the elderly are clearly among the most vulnerable and the “least of my brothers and sisters.”

The command to love our neighbor as ourselves does not include an exception for those circumstances in which we have power over others. It is in those very circumstances when the virtue of loving our neighbor as ourselves becomes particularly compelling and particularly meritorious.

Absolute respect for all human life and treating all persons with profound dignity are two sides of the same coin: Respecting human dignity in all its particulars!

Deacon Pete Gummere is a bioethicist and adjunct faculty at Pontifical College Josephinum and Theology Instructor at St. Therese Digital Academy. He serves at Corpus Christi Parish in the St. Johnsbury area.

—Originally published in the Summer 2019 issue of Vermont Catholic magazine.